Filter by:
- Informatics > Data management
- Protected Areas > Protected Area Categories > Ecological Corridors
- Ecosystem Assessment > Habitats > Polar
- Ecosystem Assessment > Regional and National Capacity Support
- Protected Areas > Monitoring Protected Areas > Protected Area Indicators
- Ecosystem Assessment > Ecosystem Services & Valuation > TEEB
Add filters:
- Biodiversity, Biomass and Food Security
- Biodiversity Sciences
- Business, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
- Climate Change and Biodiversity
- Ecosystem Assessment
- Informatics
- International Policy and Strategy
- Marine Assessment and Decision Support
- Protected Areas
- Species
- About UNEP-WCMC
Policies
UNEP-WCMC does not assert any intellectual property rights in the data made available to it by data providers.
Access to UNEP-WCMC datasets is provided on the understanding that you read and consent to be bound by the Terms and Conditions set out in the policies below.
Datasets, Tools & Reports
-
Biodiversity information on the Internet: cornucopia or confusion? »
The range of information on biodiversity currently available via the Internet is reviewed and its accessibility, usefulness and relevance to biodiversity research and to policy decision making assessed. Commercial and non-commercial databases are reviewed. The future of information via the net is also reviewed, in particular the role of the `Clearing House Mechanism' of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Biodiversity Conservation Information System.
Resource Type: Journal Papers -
Siberia - Asia's great wilderness »
-
Synthesis of Effects in Four Arctic Subregions »
An assessment of impacts on Arctic terrestrial ecosystems has emphasized geographical variability in responses of species and ecosystems to environmental change. This variability is usually associated with north-south gradients in climate, biodiversity, vegetation zones, and ecosystem structure and function. It is clear, however, that significant east-west variability in environment, ecosystem structure and function, environmental history, and recent climate variability is also important.Some areas have cooled while others have become warmer.
Overall, the subregional synthesis demonstrates the difficulty of generalizing projections of responses of ecosystem structure and function, species loss, and biospheric feedbacks to the climate system for the whole Arctic region and implies a need for a far greater understanding of the spatial variability in the responses of terrestrial arctic ecosystems to climate change.
Resource Type: Journal Papers
