Definition of a Protected Area
The definition of a protected area adopted by IUCN is:
- An area of land and/or sea especially dedicated
to the protection and maintenance of biological diversity, and of natural
and associated cultural resources, and managed through legal or other
effective means
Although all protected areas meet the general purposes contained
in this definition, in practice the precise purposes for which protected
areas are managed differ greatly. The following are the main purposes of
management:
- Scientific research
- Wilderness protection
- Preservation of species and genetic diversity
- Maintenance of environmental services
- Protection of specific natural and cultural features
- Tourism and recreation
- Education
- Sustainable use of resources from natural ecosystems
- Maintenance of cultural and traditional attributes
IUCN Protected Areas Management Categories
IUCN has defined a series of protected area management categories
based on management objective. Definitions of these categories, and examples
of each, are provided in Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories
(IUCN, 1994). The six categories are:
CATEGORY Ia: Strict Nature Reserve:
protected area managed mainly for science
Definition: Area of land and/or sea possessing
some outstanding or representative ecosystems, geological or physiological
features and/or species, available primarily for scientific research and/or
environmental monitoring.
CATEGORY Ib : Wilderness Area: protected area
managed mainly for wilderness protection
Definition:Large area of unmodified or slightly
modified land, and/or sea, retaining its natural character and influence,
without permanent or significant habitation, which is protected and managed
so as to preserve its natural condition.
CATEGORY II : National Park: protected area managed
mainly for ecosystem protection and recreation
Definition:Natural area of land and/or sea, designated
to (a) protect the ecological integrity of one or more ecosystems for
present and future generations, (b) exclude exploitation or occupation
inimical to the purposes of designation of the area and (c) provide a
foundation for spiritual, scientific, educational, recreational and visitor
opportunities, all of which must be environmentally and culturally compatible.
CATEGORY III : Natural Monument: protected area
managed mainly for conservation of specific natural features
Definition: Area containing one, or more, specific
natural or natural/cultural feature which is of outstanding or unique
value because of its inherent rarity, representative or aesthetic qualities
or cultural significance.
CATEGORY IV : Habitat/Species Management Area:
protected area managed mainly for conservation through management intervention
Definition:Area of land and/or sea subject to active
intervention for management purposes so as to ensure the maintenance of
habitats and/or to meet the requirements of specific species.
CATEGORY V : Protected Landscape/Seascape: protected
area managed mainly for landscape/seascape conservation and recreation
Definition: Area of land, with coast and sea as
appropriate, where the interaction of people and nature over time has
produced an area of distinct character with significant aesthetic, ecological
and/or cultural value, and often with high biological diversity. Safeguarding
the integrity of this traditional interaction is vital to the protection,
maintenance and evolution of such an area.
CATEGORY VI : Managed Resource Protected
Area: protected area managed mainly for the sustainable use of natural ecosystems
Definition: Area containing predominantly unmodified
natural systems, managed to ensure long term protection and maintenance
of biological diversity, while providing at the same time a sustainable
flow of natural products and services to meet community needs.
Where the site does not meet the internationally
recognised definition of a protected area, application of a management category
is not appropriate. This is indicated as category unassigned (UA)
in WCMC protected area lists.
Issues in Categorizing Protected Areas
National protected area systems
At the national level, a variety of designations is used, and will continue
to be used. Because of this, it is inevitable that the same designation
may mean different things in different countries; and different designations
in different countries may be used to describe the same category of protected
area. This is one of the key reasons for defining and using at the international
level a system of categories identified by management objectives in a system
which does not depend on titles. This category system is intended to operate
in the same way in all countries so as to facilitate the collection and
handling of comparable data, and to improve communication between countries.
Regional Variation
The conditions for the establishment and management of protected areas
vary greatly from region to region, and from country to country. For example,
regions like Europe with long-settled, long-managed landscapes in multiple
ownership are not, on the whole, as suited to the establishment of Category
II areas - but on the other hand, their circumstances are more conducive
to the establishment of Category IV and V areas. IUCN does not favour
different standards being used in the application of these categories
in different parts of the world, as this would counter the value of having
a defined standard. However, the flexibility which is inherent in these
guidelines should help in their application to the conditions in different
regions and countries
Size of Protected Areas
The size of an area should reflect the extent of land or water needed
to accomplish the purposes of management. For example, for a Category
I area, the size should be that needed to ensure the integrity of the
area to accomplish the management objective of strict protection, either
as a baseline area or research site, or for wilderness protection. For
a Category II area, the boundaries should be drawn sufficiently widely
that they contain one, or more, entire ecosystems which are not subject
to material modification by human exploitation or occupation.
Zoning within Protected Areas
Though the primary purposes of management will determine the category
to which an area is assigned, management plans will often contain management
zones for a variety of purposes which take account of local conditions.
However, in order to establish the appropriate category, at least three-quarters
and preferably more of the area must be managed for the primary purpose;
and the management of the remaining area must not be in conflict with
that primary purpose. Cases where parts of a single management unit are
classified by law as having different management objectives are discussed
under the heading of multiple classifications.
Multiple Classifications
Protected areas of different categories are often contiguous; sometimes
one category 'nests' within another. Thus many Category V areas contain
within them Category I and IV areas; some will adjoin Category II areas.
Again, some Category II areas contain Category Ia and Ib areas. This is
entirely consistent with the application of the system, providing such
areas are identified separately for accounting and reporting purposes.
Although there are obvious benefits in having the entire area within the
responsibility of one management authority, this may not always be appropriate;
in such cases, close cooperation between authorities will be essential.
Management Responsibility
Governments have a fundamental responsibility for the existence and well
being of national systems of protected areas. They should regard such
areas as important components of national strategies for conservation
and sustainable development. However, the actual responsibility for management
of individual protected areas may rest with central, regional or local
government, non governmental organisations, the private sector or the
local community. The test is whether the designated authority is capable
of achieving the management objectives. In practice, protected area Categories
I-III will usually be the responsibility of some form of governmental
body, while responsibility for categories IV and V may rest with local
administrations, albeit usually working within the framework of national
legislation.
Ownership of Land
As with the question of the managing authority, the key test is whether
the type of ownership is compatible with the achievement of the management
objectives. In many countries ownership by some form of public body (whether
nationally or locally based), or an appropriately constituted non-governmental
body with conservation objectives, facilitates management and is therefore
to be favoured in Categories I-III in particular. However, this is not
universally true, and - in the remaining categories - private ownership
will be much more common, often being the predominant form of land ownership.
Local communities
Whatever the ownership, experience shows that the success of management
depends greatly on the good will and support of local communities. In
such cases, the managing authority will need to have good consultative
and communications systems, and effective mechanisms which may include
incentives, to secure compliance with management objectives.
Areas around Protected Areas
Protected areas are not isolated units. Ecologically, economically, politically
and culturally, they are linked to the areas around them. For that reason,
the planning and management of protected areas must be incorporated within
regional planning, and supported by the policies adopted for wider areas.
For the purposes of the application of the categories system, however,
where one area is used to 'buffer' or surround another, both their categories
should be separately identified and recorded.
IUCN (1994). Guidelines for Protected Areas Management
Categories. IUCN, Cambridge, UK and Gland, Switzerland. 261pp.