Visit the UK NEA website
Read the UK NEA reports
Ecosystems have not always been taken into account by policymakers, and the essential services they deliver have often been undervalued. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment (NEA), published in 2011, was an important milestone in providing the necessary data and analysis for the full value of ecosystem services to be recognized. Alongside its wealth of findings, however, it also identified several gaps in the knowledge base, particularly concerning the economic analysis of ecosystem services.
The NEA also put forward a series of evidence-based arguments about ecosystem management. In order to influence decision-making processes, these arguments must be accessible and applicable to a wide range of stakeholders across the UK.
UNEP-WCMC is hosting the Secretariat of a two-year UK NEA Follow-On phase (UK NEAFO). Launched in 2012, this collaborative effort between experts from a wide variety of specialism’s aims to help address important gaps in scientific evidence, as well as meeting the practical challenges of making information accessible to decision makers. A team of Principal Investigators, whose work is organized across four thematic areas, is currently:
To ensure the widest possible impact for its work, the team is engaging with a broad range of stakeholders to understand their information needs. Some of their findings will also feed directly into the work of the Natural Capital Committee, an independent advisory body formed in 2012 to help the government to prioritize actions that support and improve the UK’s natural assets.
The UNEP-WCMC Secretariat for UK NEAFO comprises Claire Brown, Matthew Ling, Lucy Wilson and Nadine Bowles-Newark. Their experience includes working on the UK NEA and the Sub-Global Assessment Network, capacity building for ecosystem assessments, and measuring, monitoring and mapping ecosystem services.
UK NEAFO is funded by the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, The Welsh Government, the Natural Environment Research Council, the Economic and Social Research Council, and the Arts and Humanities Research Council.